<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>app03</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 20:14:23 +0000</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Restore the Military - Episodes Tagged with “Ndaa”</title>
    <link>https://restorethemilitary.fireside.fm/tags/ndaa</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>Hosted by military veterans Doug Truax and Will Thibeau, Restore the Military podcast is designed to cut through Pentagon spin and focus on real legislative reform.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>Restore the Military podcast explains exactly what is broken in our military—and how Congress can actually fix it.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Hosted by military veterans Doug Truax and Will Thibeau, Restore the Military podcast is designed to cut through Pentagon spin and focus on real legislative reform.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/9/91f58ac7-6309-4149-836a-77ffe250e1a1/cover.jpg?v=2"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>socials@restorationpac.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Arts"/>
<item>
  <title>Episode 6: America’s Military Readiness Crisis </title>
  <link>https://restorethemilitary.fireside.fm/americas-military-readiness-crisis</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">f3748cce-84a5-46bf-b676-62491f12a0de</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/91f58ac7-6309-4149-836a-77ffe250e1a1/f3748cce-84a5-46bf-b676-62491f12a0de.mp3" length="45067493" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Can the United States actually fight one war right now — let alone two? Hosts Doug Truax and Will Thibeau dig into the Strategic Equipment Reserve, the state of the American defense industrial base, and why the numbers behind U.S. munitions stockpiles should worry every voter.

In this episode:
• What CSIS's 2023 Taiwan invasion wargames revealed about how fast key precision munitions run out
• How U.S. aid to Ukraine drained Javelin, Stinger, and artillery stocks with no fast replacement plan in place
• Why China's grip on rare earths and critical components is a vulnerability an adversary could exploit early in any future conflict
• The Strategic Equipment Reserve provision: a two-war stockpile, dedicated training stocks, a five-year domestic sourcing mandate, and new restrictions on diverting reserves abroad
• Why this is the rare defense reform with bipartisan support — and the lowest conference risk in the entire package
• The real cost of rebuilding the arsenal, and why it's dramatically cheaper than the cost of losing</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>18:46</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/9/91f58ac7-6309-4149-836a-77ffe250e1a1/cover.jpg?v=2"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Can the United States actually fight one war right now — let alone two? Hosts Doug Truax and Will Thibeau dig into the Strategic Equipment Reserve, the state of the American defense industrial base, and why the numbers behind U.S. munitions stockpiles should worry every voter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In this episode:&lt;br&gt;
• What CSIS's 2023 Taiwan invasion wargames revealed about how fast key precision munitions run out&lt;br&gt;
• How U.S. aid to Ukraine drained Javelin, Stinger, and artillery stocks with no fast replacement plan in place&lt;br&gt;
• Why China's grip on rare earths and critical components is a vulnerability an adversary could exploit early in any future conflict&lt;br&gt;
• The Strategic Equipment Reserve provision: a two-war stockpile, dedicated training stocks, a five-year domestic sourcing mandate, and new restrictions on diverting reserves abroad&lt;br&gt;
• Why this is the rare defense reform with bipartisan support — and the lowest conference risk in the entire package&lt;br&gt;
• The real cost of rebuilding the arsenal, and why it's dramatically cheaper than the cost of losing &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>Doug Truax, Will Thibeau, Military Reform</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Can the United States actually fight one war right now — let alone two? Hosts Doug Truax and Will Thibeau dig into the Strategic Equipment Reserve, the state of the American defense industrial base, and why the numbers behind U.S. munitions stockpiles should worry every voter.</p>

<p>In this episode:<br>
• What CSIS's 2023 Taiwan invasion wargames revealed about how fast key precision munitions run out<br>
• How U.S. aid to Ukraine drained Javelin, Stinger, and artillery stocks with no fast replacement plan in place<br>
• Why China's grip on rare earths and critical components is a vulnerability an adversary could exploit early in any future conflict<br>
• The Strategic Equipment Reserve provision: a two-war stockpile, dedicated training stocks, a five-year domestic sourcing mandate, and new restrictions on diverting reserves abroad<br>
• Why this is the rare defense reform with bipartisan support — and the lowest conference risk in the entire package<br>
• The real cost of rebuilding the arsenal, and why it's dramatically cheaper than the cost of losing</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Can the United States actually fight one war right now — let alone two? Hosts Doug Truax and Will Thibeau dig into the Strategic Equipment Reserve, the state of the American defense industrial base, and why the numbers behind U.S. munitions stockpiles should worry every voter.</p>

<p>In this episode:<br>
• What CSIS's 2023 Taiwan invasion wargames revealed about how fast key precision munitions run out<br>
• How U.S. aid to Ukraine drained Javelin, Stinger, and artillery stocks with no fast replacement plan in place<br>
• Why China's grip on rare earths and critical components is a vulnerability an adversary could exploit early in any future conflict<br>
• The Strategic Equipment Reserve provision: a two-war stockpile, dedicated training stocks, a five-year domestic sourcing mandate, and new restrictions on diverting reserves abroad<br>
• Why this is the rare defense reform with bipartisan support — and the lowest conference risk in the entire package<br>
• The real cost of rebuilding the arsenal, and why it's dramatically cheaper than the cost of losing</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Episode 5: The Battle for Control of America's Military</title>
  <link>https://restorethemilitary.fireside.fm/the-battle-for-control-of-americas-military</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">ce476b3b-4591-4786-9472-722f4ec13c77</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/91f58ac7-6309-4149-836a-77ffe250e1a1/ce476b3b-4591-4786-9472-722f4ec13c77.mp3" length="46797844" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>19:29</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/9/91f58ac7-6309-4149-836a-77ffe250e1a1/cover.jpg?v=2"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Dismantling the Pentagon Bureaucracy: Joint Staff Reform &amp;amp; the First Goldwater-Nichols Overhaul in 39 Years&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Joint Staff was created in 1986 as a lean planning body to fix the command failures behind Desert One and Grenada. Today it's a 4,000-plus person bureaucracy that competes with the very Services it was built to coordinate — and it's never been comprehensively reformed. Until now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In this episode of Restore the Military, Doug Truax and Will Thibeau break down the FY 2027 NDAA provision that would cap Joint Staff personnel at 1,500, eliminate mandatory joint duty as a promotion requirement, return general and flag officer selection to the Service Secretaries, and stand up a bipartisan commission to conduct the first full review of Goldwater-Nichols in nearly four decades.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They dig into:&lt;br&gt;
-Why the 1986 Joint Staff has grown into an institution that rivals the Office of the Secretary of War and the combatant commands for power and resources&lt;br&gt;
-How mandatory joint duty pulled the Pentagon's best operational officers out of command and into staff jobs — and what eliminating it would mean&lt;br&gt;
-What the reform package actually does: personnel caps, statutory limits under 10 U.S.C. § 155, relocation outside the Pentagon, and more&lt;br&gt;
-Why the Goldwater-Nichols commission may be the most consequential — and most survivable — piece of the whole package&lt;br&gt;
-The institutional playbook the Joint Staff will run to kill this in conference, and why a public White House signal is the deciding factor&lt;br&gt;
-Why an operating system built for 1986 warfare hasn't kept pace with cyber, space, autonomous systems, and great-power competition&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Goldwater-Nichols was the right answer in 1986. It's not the right answer in 2026 — and the institution has never reformed itself voluntarily. Congress has to do it. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>Doug Truax, Will Thibeau, Military Reform</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Dismantling the Pentagon Bureaucracy: Joint Staff Reform &amp; the First Goldwater-Nichols Overhaul in 39 Years</p>

<p>The Joint Staff was created in 1986 as a lean planning body to fix the command failures behind Desert One and Grenada. Today it's a 4,000-plus person bureaucracy that competes with the very Services it was built to coordinate — and it's never been comprehensively reformed. Until now.</p>

<p>In this episode of Restore the Military, Doug Truax and Will Thibeau break down the FY 2027 NDAA provision that would cap Joint Staff personnel at 1,500, eliminate mandatory joint duty as a promotion requirement, return general and flag officer selection to the Service Secretaries, and stand up a bipartisan commission to conduct the first full review of Goldwater-Nichols in nearly four decades.</p>

<p>They dig into:<br>
-Why the 1986 Joint Staff has grown into an institution that rivals the Office of the Secretary of War and the combatant commands for power and resources<br>
-How mandatory joint duty pulled the Pentagon's best operational officers out of command and into staff jobs — and what eliminating it would mean<br>
-What the reform package actually does: personnel caps, statutory limits under 10 U.S.C. § 155, relocation outside the Pentagon, and more<br>
-Why the Goldwater-Nichols commission may be the most consequential — and most survivable — piece of the whole package<br>
-The institutional playbook the Joint Staff will run to kill this in conference, and why a public White House signal is the deciding factor<br>
-Why an operating system built for 1986 warfare hasn't kept pace with cyber, space, autonomous systems, and great-power competition</p>

<p>Goldwater-Nichols was the right answer in 1986. It's not the right answer in 2026 — and the institution has never reformed itself voluntarily. Congress has to do it.</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Dismantling the Pentagon Bureaucracy: Joint Staff Reform &amp; the First Goldwater-Nichols Overhaul in 39 Years</p>

<p>The Joint Staff was created in 1986 as a lean planning body to fix the command failures behind Desert One and Grenada. Today it's a 4,000-plus person bureaucracy that competes with the very Services it was built to coordinate — and it's never been comprehensively reformed. Until now.</p>

<p>In this episode of Restore the Military, Doug Truax and Will Thibeau break down the FY 2027 NDAA provision that would cap Joint Staff personnel at 1,500, eliminate mandatory joint duty as a promotion requirement, return general and flag officer selection to the Service Secretaries, and stand up a bipartisan commission to conduct the first full review of Goldwater-Nichols in nearly four decades.</p>

<p>They dig into:<br>
-Why the 1986 Joint Staff has grown into an institution that rivals the Office of the Secretary of War and the combatant commands for power and resources<br>
-How mandatory joint duty pulled the Pentagon's best operational officers out of command and into staff jobs — and what eliminating it would mean<br>
-What the reform package actually does: personnel caps, statutory limits under 10 U.S.C. § 155, relocation outside the Pentagon, and more<br>
-Why the Goldwater-Nichols commission may be the most consequential — and most survivable — piece of the whole package<br>
-The institutional playbook the Joint Staff will run to kill this in conference, and why a public White House signal is the deciding factor<br>
-Why an operating system built for 1986 warfare hasn't kept pace with cyber, space, autonomous systems, and great-power competition</p>

<p>Goldwater-Nichols was the right answer in 1986. It's not the right answer in 2026 — and the institution has never reformed itself voluntarily. Congress has to do it.</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Episode 2: The Truth About Women in Combat Units</title>
  <link>https://restorethemilitary.fireside.fm/the-truth-about-women-in-combat-units</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">e70fce3d-cd76-4919-a6a5-792712b33b16</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/91f58ac7-6309-4149-836a-77ffe250e1a1/e70fce3d-cd76-4919-a6a5-792712b33b16.mp3" length="47766464" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>In 2015, the Marine Corps conducted a landmark nine-month study on gender-integrated combat units and found that all-male squads outperformed integrated squads on 69 percent of tasks — yet the Obama administration opened all combat positions to women anyway. A decade later, Congress is finally attempting to legislate sex-neutral fitness standards into permanent law, and this episode breaks down the data, the political decisions that overrode it, and what's at stake in the current fight.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>19:54</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/9/91f58ac7-6309-4149-836a-77ffe250e1a1/cover.jpg?v=2"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;In 2015, the Marine Corps completed the most comprehensive study ever conducted on gender-integrated combat units. The results were unambiguous — and then they were ignored.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Doug Truax and Will Thibeau break down the Ground Combat Element Integrated Task Force findings, what happened when the data collided with Obama-era policy, and why Congress is now attempting to legislate sex-neutral fitness standards into permanent law for the first time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They cover:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;  What the 2015 GCEITF study found — and why the Secretary of the Navy rejected it before the report was even released&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;  How the Army Combat Fitness Test was redesigned to produce equal pass rates rather than measure combat capability&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;  The specific legislative provisions in the FY2027 NDAA cycle — and why this is the highest-risk item going into conference&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;  The fallback strategy if the combat exclusion gets stripped in negotiations&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;  Why none of this gets easier with a Pacific theater conflict on the horizon&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Marine Corps did its job. Now it's Congress's turn. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>Doug Truax, Will Thibeau, Military Reform</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>In 2015, the Marine Corps completed the most comprehensive study ever conducted on gender-integrated combat units. The results were unambiguous — and then they were ignored.</p>

<p>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau break down the Ground Combat Element Integrated Task Force findings, what happened when the data collided with Obama-era policy, and why Congress is now attempting to legislate sex-neutral fitness standards into permanent law for the first time.</p>

<p>They cover:</p>

<ul>
<li>  What the 2015 GCEITF study found — and why the Secretary of the Navy rejected it before the report was even released</li>
<li>  How the Army Combat Fitness Test was redesigned to produce equal pass rates rather than measure combat capability</li>
<li>  The specific legislative provisions in the FY2027 NDAA cycle — and why this is the highest-risk item going into conference</li>
<li>  The fallback strategy if the combat exclusion gets stripped in negotiations</li>
<li>  Why none of this gets easier with a Pacific theater conflict on the horizon</li>
</ul>

<p>The Marine Corps did its job. Now it's Congress's turn.</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>In 2015, the Marine Corps completed the most comprehensive study ever conducted on gender-integrated combat units. The results were unambiguous — and then they were ignored.</p>

<p>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau break down the Ground Combat Element Integrated Task Force findings, what happened when the data collided with Obama-era policy, and why Congress is now attempting to legislate sex-neutral fitness standards into permanent law for the first time.</p>

<p>They cover:</p>

<ul>
<li>  What the 2015 GCEITF study found — and why the Secretary of the Navy rejected it before the report was even released</li>
<li>  How the Army Combat Fitness Test was redesigned to produce equal pass rates rather than measure combat capability</li>
<li>  The specific legislative provisions in the FY2027 NDAA cycle — and why this is the highest-risk item going into conference</li>
<li>  The fallback strategy if the combat exclusion gets stripped in negotiations</li>
<li>  Why none of this gets easier with a Pacific theater conflict on the horizon</li>
</ul>

<p>The Marine Corps did its job. Now it's Congress's turn.</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Episode 1: The Battle Over Merit in America's Military</title>
  <link>https://restorethemilitary.fireside.fm/the-battle-over-merit-in-americas-military</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">3529795d-81bc-4af5-bc10-f9a536b22d70</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/91f58ac7-6309-4149-836a-77ffe250e1a1/3529795d-81bc-4af5-bc10-f9a536b22d70.mp3" length="35931950" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>The episode opens with a pointed argument: the Supreme Court's 2023 Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard ruling struck down race-conscious admissions in higher education, but the service academies have continued operating under identity-based admissions frameworks using an untested "national security" rationale. Doug and Will argue the legal exposure is real and growing — and that it's better to fix it through statute now than have a court opinion force the issue later.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>14:58</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/9/91f58ac7-6309-4149-836a-77ffe250e1a1/cover.jpg?v=2"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;The Supreme Court struck down race-conscious admissions in 2023. The service academies are still operating like it didn't happen. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Doug Truax and Will Thibeau break down the legal exposure, the DEI architecture embedded across the Department of War by directive and instruction, and what a real statutory prohibition looks like — with enforcement teeth, audit authority, and consequences. The window to fix it before the next Court ruling is closing. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>Doug Truax, Will Thibeau, Military Reform</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court struck down race-conscious admissions in 2023. The service academies are still operating like it didn't happen. </p>

<p>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau break down the legal exposure, the DEI architecture embedded across the Department of War by directive and instruction, and what a real statutory prohibition looks like — with enforcement teeth, audit authority, and consequences. The window to fix it before the next Court ruling is closing.</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court struck down race-conscious admissions in 2023. The service academies are still operating like it didn't happen. </p>

<p>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau break down the legal exposure, the DEI architecture embedded across the Department of War by directive and instruction, and what a real statutory prohibition looks like — with enforcement teeth, audit authority, and consequences. The window to fix it before the next Court ruling is closing.</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
