<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>app01</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 20:15:29 +0000</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Restore the Military - Episodes Tagged with “Pentagon Reform”</title>
    <link>https://restorethemilitary.fireside.fm/tags/pentagon%20reform</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>Hosted by military veterans Doug Truax and Will Thibeau, Restore the Military podcast is designed to cut through Pentagon spin and focus on real legislative reform.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>Restore the Military podcast explains exactly what is broken in our military—and how Congress can actually fix it.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Hosted by military veterans Doug Truax and Will Thibeau, Restore the Military podcast is designed to cut through Pentagon spin and focus on real legislative reform.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/9/91f58ac7-6309-4149-836a-77ffe250e1a1/cover.jpg?v=2"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>socials@restorationpac.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Arts"/>
<item>
  <title>Episode 6: America’s Military Readiness Crisis </title>
  <link>https://restorethemilitary.fireside.fm/americas-military-readiness-crisis</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">f3748cce-84a5-46bf-b676-62491f12a0de</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/91f58ac7-6309-4149-836a-77ffe250e1a1/f3748cce-84a5-46bf-b676-62491f12a0de.mp3" length="45067493" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Can the United States actually fight one war right now — let alone two? Hosts Doug Truax and Will Thibeau dig into the Strategic Equipment Reserve, the state of the American defense industrial base, and why the numbers behind U.S. munitions stockpiles should worry every voter.

In this episode:
• What CSIS's 2023 Taiwan invasion wargames revealed about how fast key precision munitions run out
• How U.S. aid to Ukraine drained Javelin, Stinger, and artillery stocks with no fast replacement plan in place
• Why China's grip on rare earths and critical components is a vulnerability an adversary could exploit early in any future conflict
• The Strategic Equipment Reserve provision: a two-war stockpile, dedicated training stocks, a five-year domestic sourcing mandate, and new restrictions on diverting reserves abroad
• Why this is the rare defense reform with bipartisan support — and the lowest conference risk in the entire package
• The real cost of rebuilding the arsenal, and why it's dramatically cheaper than the cost of losing</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>18:46</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/9/91f58ac7-6309-4149-836a-77ffe250e1a1/cover.jpg?v=2"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Can the United States actually fight one war right now — let alone two? Hosts Doug Truax and Will Thibeau dig into the Strategic Equipment Reserve, the state of the American defense industrial base, and why the numbers behind U.S. munitions stockpiles should worry every voter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In this episode:&lt;br&gt;
• What CSIS's 2023 Taiwan invasion wargames revealed about how fast key precision munitions run out&lt;br&gt;
• How U.S. aid to Ukraine drained Javelin, Stinger, and artillery stocks with no fast replacement plan in place&lt;br&gt;
• Why China's grip on rare earths and critical components is a vulnerability an adversary could exploit early in any future conflict&lt;br&gt;
• The Strategic Equipment Reserve provision: a two-war stockpile, dedicated training stocks, a five-year domestic sourcing mandate, and new restrictions on diverting reserves abroad&lt;br&gt;
• Why this is the rare defense reform with bipartisan support — and the lowest conference risk in the entire package&lt;br&gt;
• The real cost of rebuilding the arsenal, and why it's dramatically cheaper than the cost of losing &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>Doug Truax, Will Thibeau, Military Reform</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Can the United States actually fight one war right now — let alone two? Hosts Doug Truax and Will Thibeau dig into the Strategic Equipment Reserve, the state of the American defense industrial base, and why the numbers behind U.S. munitions stockpiles should worry every voter.</p>

<p>In this episode:<br>
• What CSIS's 2023 Taiwan invasion wargames revealed about how fast key precision munitions run out<br>
• How U.S. aid to Ukraine drained Javelin, Stinger, and artillery stocks with no fast replacement plan in place<br>
• Why China's grip on rare earths and critical components is a vulnerability an adversary could exploit early in any future conflict<br>
• The Strategic Equipment Reserve provision: a two-war stockpile, dedicated training stocks, a five-year domestic sourcing mandate, and new restrictions on diverting reserves abroad<br>
• Why this is the rare defense reform with bipartisan support — and the lowest conference risk in the entire package<br>
• The real cost of rebuilding the arsenal, and why it's dramatically cheaper than the cost of losing</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Can the United States actually fight one war right now — let alone two? Hosts Doug Truax and Will Thibeau dig into the Strategic Equipment Reserve, the state of the American defense industrial base, and why the numbers behind U.S. munitions stockpiles should worry every voter.</p>

<p>In this episode:<br>
• What CSIS's 2023 Taiwan invasion wargames revealed about how fast key precision munitions run out<br>
• How U.S. aid to Ukraine drained Javelin, Stinger, and artillery stocks with no fast replacement plan in place<br>
• Why China's grip on rare earths and critical components is a vulnerability an adversary could exploit early in any future conflict<br>
• The Strategic Equipment Reserve provision: a two-war stockpile, dedicated training stocks, a five-year domestic sourcing mandate, and new restrictions on diverting reserves abroad<br>
• Why this is the rare defense reform with bipartisan support — and the lowest conference risk in the entire package<br>
• The real cost of rebuilding the arsenal, and why it's dramatically cheaper than the cost of losing</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Episode 5: The Battle for Control of America's Military</title>
  <link>https://restorethemilitary.fireside.fm/the-battle-for-control-of-americas-military</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">ce476b3b-4591-4786-9472-722f4ec13c77</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/91f58ac7-6309-4149-836a-77ffe250e1a1/ce476b3b-4591-4786-9472-722f4ec13c77.mp3" length="46797844" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Doug Truax and Will Thibeau</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>19:29</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/9/91f58ac7-6309-4149-836a-77ffe250e1a1/cover.jpg?v=2"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Dismantling the Pentagon Bureaucracy: Joint Staff Reform &amp;amp; the First Goldwater-Nichols Overhaul in 39 Years&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Joint Staff was created in 1986 as a lean planning body to fix the command failures behind Desert One and Grenada. Today it's a 4,000-plus person bureaucracy that competes with the very Services it was built to coordinate — and it's never been comprehensively reformed. Until now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In this episode of Restore the Military, Doug Truax and Will Thibeau break down the FY 2027 NDAA provision that would cap Joint Staff personnel at 1,500, eliminate mandatory joint duty as a promotion requirement, return general and flag officer selection to the Service Secretaries, and stand up a bipartisan commission to conduct the first full review of Goldwater-Nichols in nearly four decades.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They dig into:&lt;br&gt;
-Why the 1986 Joint Staff has grown into an institution that rivals the Office of the Secretary of War and the combatant commands for power and resources&lt;br&gt;
-How mandatory joint duty pulled the Pentagon's best operational officers out of command and into staff jobs — and what eliminating it would mean&lt;br&gt;
-What the reform package actually does: personnel caps, statutory limits under 10 U.S.C. § 155, relocation outside the Pentagon, and more&lt;br&gt;
-Why the Goldwater-Nichols commission may be the most consequential — and most survivable — piece of the whole package&lt;br&gt;
-The institutional playbook the Joint Staff will run to kill this in conference, and why a public White House signal is the deciding factor&lt;br&gt;
-Why an operating system built for 1986 warfare hasn't kept pace with cyber, space, autonomous systems, and great-power competition&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Goldwater-Nichols was the right answer in 1986. It's not the right answer in 2026 — and the institution has never reformed itself voluntarily. Congress has to do it. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>Doug Truax, Will Thibeau, Military Reform</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Dismantling the Pentagon Bureaucracy: Joint Staff Reform &amp; the First Goldwater-Nichols Overhaul in 39 Years</p>

<p>The Joint Staff was created in 1986 as a lean planning body to fix the command failures behind Desert One and Grenada. Today it's a 4,000-plus person bureaucracy that competes with the very Services it was built to coordinate — and it's never been comprehensively reformed. Until now.</p>

<p>In this episode of Restore the Military, Doug Truax and Will Thibeau break down the FY 2027 NDAA provision that would cap Joint Staff personnel at 1,500, eliminate mandatory joint duty as a promotion requirement, return general and flag officer selection to the Service Secretaries, and stand up a bipartisan commission to conduct the first full review of Goldwater-Nichols in nearly four decades.</p>

<p>They dig into:<br>
-Why the 1986 Joint Staff has grown into an institution that rivals the Office of the Secretary of War and the combatant commands for power and resources<br>
-How mandatory joint duty pulled the Pentagon's best operational officers out of command and into staff jobs — and what eliminating it would mean<br>
-What the reform package actually does: personnel caps, statutory limits under 10 U.S.C. § 155, relocation outside the Pentagon, and more<br>
-Why the Goldwater-Nichols commission may be the most consequential — and most survivable — piece of the whole package<br>
-The institutional playbook the Joint Staff will run to kill this in conference, and why a public White House signal is the deciding factor<br>
-Why an operating system built for 1986 warfare hasn't kept pace with cyber, space, autonomous systems, and great-power competition</p>

<p>Goldwater-Nichols was the right answer in 1986. It's not the right answer in 2026 — and the institution has never reformed itself voluntarily. Congress has to do it.</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Dismantling the Pentagon Bureaucracy: Joint Staff Reform &amp; the First Goldwater-Nichols Overhaul in 39 Years</p>

<p>The Joint Staff was created in 1986 as a lean planning body to fix the command failures behind Desert One and Grenada. Today it's a 4,000-plus person bureaucracy that competes with the very Services it was built to coordinate — and it's never been comprehensively reformed. Until now.</p>

<p>In this episode of Restore the Military, Doug Truax and Will Thibeau break down the FY 2027 NDAA provision that would cap Joint Staff personnel at 1,500, eliminate mandatory joint duty as a promotion requirement, return general and flag officer selection to the Service Secretaries, and stand up a bipartisan commission to conduct the first full review of Goldwater-Nichols in nearly four decades.</p>

<p>They dig into:<br>
-Why the 1986 Joint Staff has grown into an institution that rivals the Office of the Secretary of War and the combatant commands for power and resources<br>
-How mandatory joint duty pulled the Pentagon's best operational officers out of command and into staff jobs — and what eliminating it would mean<br>
-What the reform package actually does: personnel caps, statutory limits under 10 U.S.C. § 155, relocation outside the Pentagon, and more<br>
-Why the Goldwater-Nichols commission may be the most consequential — and most survivable — piece of the whole package<br>
-The institutional playbook the Joint Staff will run to kill this in conference, and why a public White House signal is the deciding factor<br>
-Why an operating system built for 1986 warfare hasn't kept pace with cyber, space, autonomous systems, and great-power competition</p>

<p>Goldwater-Nichols was the right answer in 1986. It's not the right answer in 2026 — and the institution has never reformed itself voluntarily. Congress has to do it.</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
